A £999 laptop had just spat loose tarmac into the front grille of its £3,500 cousin in a display of raw pace. This genuinely surprised me, as you’ll see in the video reaction at the top of this article. The Air? Silent (it has no fan), and barely lukewarm. Its fans were also roaring and near takeoff speed, and the metal above the keyboard was too hot to keep your finger on for any longer than a few seconds. The 16” MacBook Pro took about five minutes and was noticeably slower. That alone was impressive.īut I wasn’t really prepared for what happened next. The M1 MacBook Air completed the task in around two minutes. The colour grade was simple an introduction of some contrast, slight bump in exposure and a boost to saturation. power supply, rather than battery operation.no apps running in the background, bar the built-in macOS screen recording feature.My 16” MacBook Pro has worked flawlessly for 12 months, and consistently undertakes the two tasks that would play a central role in this battle with ease. Despite the emergence of the M1 chip, I think the 16” still has a place today within lots of people’s lives and businesses.īut I am intrigued to see how it performs against the M1. I’ve been using the MacBook Pro 16” for around a year now, and it is a superb machine. The speed with which they do so will dictate how quickly I can publish my YouTube videos or get paid by clients. Why did I pick these two tasks? As a video guy, I know they’re two of the most important functions my computers perform. This involved one piece of 4K footage that was 10 minutes long, and two tasks: With limited time on my hands, I decided to conduct a quick but thorough test with a tool which I knew would put both machines through their paces.

Final cut pro 10.3.4 reddit